TRY STARCRAFT FOR FREE DETAILS FULL

It's a version that we have that has a lot of problems that we don't like. What you saw today is not where we're going. I kind of wish it wasn't, but it kind of is. We're still working on it, and it's kind of up in the air. I can't tell you a whole lot because in reality, anything I say might be a lie. Maybe it's just like, 'This game doesn't feel good.' And maybe if you're more skilled, 'This selection is bad.' And if you're awesome, 'The probe selection is bad.' So we have to work on every tiny detail as much as we can, and it's exhausting.ĭustin Browder: I don't know. You're going to start to think-maybe you won't know that the selection is crappy. But if everything in the game has that, you're going to care. You know, if the Probe has an ear that's sticking out, and you click on that and nothing happens, you're not going to care. That guy has a little corner sticking out! I should be able to click on that! Why can't I click on that? And we do that again and again and again as we go through. With every unit up on the screen, and just. I can't tell you how many times I've stared at that. We have a sphere, or a square, or a variety of shapes that surround each unit, so that we test against a smaller set of polygons so that it doesn't consume our performance every time we make a click. When you do a click, we don't test against every poly in the game.

I can't tell you how many times-we have selection geometry in the game. You're always working on the littlest, tiniest thing you can think of to improve the game. You're always arguing about the smallest detail. So you're always a minute away from being done-not really, but you know what I mean? You're always trying to make it as strong as you possibly can. I mean, you do that, but you fix it as you go, so it's always currently the highest quality experience we can figure out. So you don't get to jam in a bunch of stuff, and then just redo it. We make and polish at the same time, as we go. We're really focused on quality, and that doesn't mean-when I first thought about, I want to work at Blizzard, it's going to be so cool-I thought we would make the game and then polish it. Yeah, it's easily the most challenging development environment I've ever worked in. How has the experience been on your end?ĭustin Browder: Hard. With the game being in a playable state for so long, obviously this has been a considerable iterative process for you guys. Shack: I played a version of StarCraft II two years ago, then last year, and now today.

TRY STARCRAFT FOR FREE DETAILS FULL

What follows is a late-night preview of the full interview, to be published later today: In the process, the designer shared some exciting details on the singleplayer portion of the game. However, I did get a chance to talk at length with the affable Browder, thoroughly covering the reasons for the sequel's lengthy development period. The test is scheduled to begin sometime this summer. 'I kind of wish it wasn't, but it kind of is.'īrowder gave the typical 'when it's ready' response when asked of a beta timeframe. 'We're still working on, and it's kind of up in the air,' StarCraft II lead designer Dustin Browder told me.

Unfortunately, the team is still finalizing many features, and I left without an estimate on when the anticipated multiplayer test would begin. Last Monday, I visited Blizzard HQ expecting to get a look at the new in advance of the multiplayer beta.

Try starcraft for free details